-
September 2023 by Tom Lo
the bar association, has remained reticent while the presiding judge in the Trump case flagrantly disregards established principles of impartiality. The judge's conduct contravenes the guidelines set forth in the memorandums issued by the Department of Justice (DOJ) pertaining to refraining from interfering in elections through the utilization of court cases. Furthermore, the judge has already pronounced a guilty verdict against Trump in sentencing unrelated individuals, thereby demonstrating a clear bias. Her statements during court proceedings evince a lack of impartiality, and the substantial volume of evidence in this case renders its expeditious handling atypical. Moreover, the judge is exhibiting a lack of prudence by prioritizing this case over the initial federal case in Florida, necessitating that the court date be scheduled subsequent to the resolution of the aforementioned Florida case. The District of Columbia (DC) bar association remains silent, thereby disregarding the fundamental principles and standards that the bar association is duty-bound to uphold.
-
August 2021 by Kevin Judd
This Bar Association is moving in the right direction with its members value proposition initiatives!
-
August 2017 by Rebecca Watson
Robert Mueller has more conflicts of interest then we can count. The Code of Federal Regulations defines what constitutes a conflict. That is, xa personal relationship with any person substantially involved in the conduct that is the subject of the investigation or prosecutionx (28 CFR 45.2). Comey is that person. Mueller and Comey have been close friends for a long time. Comey admitted he leaked the memo to the New York Times hoping it would bring about a special counsel and he got one. Mueller also approved Comey’s written testimony which is an ethics violation and possible witness tampering by investigator Mueller. He should be disbarred!!!!
